Wednesday, December 18, 2013

Psychoanalytic space 1.2

Hi everyone!

The initial idea of our project was getting pictures of the praxis rooms of SFU psychoanalysts. We wanted to investigate the connection between the book “Behandlungs(t)räume” by Matejek and Lempa where the pictorial metaphors for major psychoanalytic schools were presented and interior of SFU analysts professional spaces.

We approached 5 therapists asking them for the permission to make pictures of their praxis. At this moment surprise started…

Although some of them agreed without any questions, with some we had interesting discussion. They were concerned where the pictures would be posted and who would have an access to them. We proposed to make it anonymous; it wasn’t persuasive enough for them.


That made us think- what do they defend? (If not themselves for being exposed to vague unknown public) What is the real meaning of praxis room for psychoanalyst? How much is the psychoanalyst personality there in nonverbal communication?

Maria, Sasha and Oksana
 
 
Round the world with my Capsule
 
 
 
Hi there,
 
 
since we are gone now for a wile, I`d like to tell you something about our ongoing trip around the world. It was very easy to get the licences for the differnt sites to place the capsule. I didn`t think that it will be that easy because it is the high season, and really there many travelling right now with their capsule. Also families and business men. So it was very hard to get a place for your own. In Monument Valley we where absolutly lucky because the kind of dropped us just in middle of there, because they had some trouble with the van. You can see it at the picture, really awesome!!
The pictures are kind of mixed up, but I have to hurry we need to load the capsult onto the train in den next hour, and I am waiting at the staiton right now.
How you see at the pictures we also have been in the Carribean - but well, that was a bit expensive. And we had tourbles with energie supplies, and tons of sand in our capsule. Not really nice!
Then we got transfered with the Nagasaki Original Capsule Cruiser, and it is really like everyone is telling like on a real Cruise. Get to know nice people there, and you should see the fitness capsule.
Arriving in Europe we get straight to vienna, on the picture you see our Capsule in front of the Stephansdom :-). It was fun to watch how the build in our Casule into the Viennice Capsule Tower.
Then we went to the Alps, where they forgot to pick us up with the helicopter, we got stucked for two weeks. And know how I said we are finally at the trainstation to go further on to France. Paris will be great. I will write you again soon, see you later at the SFU.
Yours Bettina, Victoria and Birgitta

 




Monday, December 2, 2013

Psychoanalytic space



Outer spaces always represent inner ones. Especially when it comes to the psychoanalytic rooms. One side they are an imaginary wombs where the patient is supposed to feel safe comfortable and cozy; where one likes to free associate and to regress. Another side it should be relatively “neutral” although we know that analytical neutrality is a myth.

No matter how disclosed the analyst is, the room speaks for itself. Interior details can evolve memories, associations, and fantasies. The light, pictures, smells, plants – all can trigger foster analytic process.

The following link invites you to explore modern analytic spaces:


Enjoy!




Maria,Sasha and Oksana

Wednesday, November 27, 2013

Grande Hotel, Beira Mozambique

The Grande Hotel stands as an architectural reminder of Mozambique’s colonial past, years of civil war, and the subsequent psychic and physical need for a nation and its citizens to rebuild. The years of struggle had left many Mozambicans homeless, destroyed much of the cities’ infrastructure and littered the countryside with landmines, making cross-country travel life-endangering. By 1992, when the civil war ended, the Grande Hotel was already home to many refugees. It has since grown into one of the largest squatted buildings in the world, comparable in both population and magnitude to the Torre David – an unfinished 45-story skyscraper in Caracas, Venezuela.




Grande Hotel, Beira, Mozambique

Torre David, Caracas, Venezuela

Both buildings emerged from extravagant aspirations tailored to high-income living and have been transformed into spaces that reflect the cities’ poverty, housing shortage and socio-economics. But what else do these spaces say about their inhabitants?

At the Grande Hotel, the living conditions appear, at first glance, deplorable and cramped.  The building no longer resembles a grandiose hotel for visiting VIPs and colonial elites, but rather an impoverished structure – a slum – that is now home to some 750 families, or roughly 2500 inhabitants. Anabela Saint Maurice’s documentary film, Grande Hotel, features Maria Pinto Sa, a Portuguese-Mozambican actress and artist, who shares her memories and current impressions of the Grande Hotel. Driving by the hotel, she remarks, “They say this is a den full of bandits, policemen, prostitutes, thieves, that’s who lives there now.”

This strikes me as being a rather limited perspective, based, perhaps, out of a fear that emerges from the act of peering in. There are, however, ample articles on the Grande Hotel, which paint a picture of an uninhabitable slum, where rats and insects scurry through the play-space of children. There is no water, no electricity, crime does occur (most of the building’s valuable materials have been stripped and sold), and the concept of privacy has an entirely different meaning here.  Moreover, the inhabitants face real risks to their health and safety.

But I can’t imagine that this village could survive -- that the human spirit could survive -- if all aspects of the Grande Hotel were as broken down as its structure. Is the Grande Hotel a den of crime and banditry? Or is it a place where resilience can still be found in abundance despite the poverty and accompanying health and social issues? This is, after all, a place where many family homes have been passed down for generations and most inhabitants have lived there for more than a decade. According to the cultural theorist Madan Sarup, “It is usually assumed that a sense of place, of belonging, gives a person stability. But what makes a place a home?”

The film offers a glimpse into the lives within this concrete village, as mayor Daviz Shimango chats with the community: Kita Joao talks about her children and husband’s job as a driver; a young man describes a common obstacle (no start-up cash) to starting a business; John Usseng and his wife illustrate the outcome of their ingenuity, having earned enough money from odd jobs that they are able to afford electricity. They also show soap operas from time to time, charging their neighbours a small fee for the service.
Other sources  describe the informal organisational structure governing the Grande Hotel, stating that:

“As in any occupied house [the Grande Hotel] has its living and organizational rules. There, the following representatives rule: the unity secretary and the secretary of the hallway, block and floor who meet up to solve the residents’ problems, and to conduct the residents’ court in one of the hotel’s former suites. There, discussions concerning who is more entitled to housing (a woman with children has the upper hand), or about who is throwing dirty water onto someone else’s balcony, take place. There are two fundamental rules: ‘keep the cleanliness and the respect’. The cleaning is maintained by nominating shifts; as for the respect, is has to be kept by everyone. ‘There have been cases of abuse and rape, and the people who perpetrated these actions were kicked out’, our host [Senhor Joao, Unity Secretary] tell us with a determined tone.”  (Source)
It seems that despite the substantial stressors the community faces – or rather because of these stressors -- adaptability, sociability and diplomacy are key, and extend outside of the building to relationships with police and neighbours. Neighbours are viewed as “utterly indispensable” for recycled water, help in an emergency (e.g. a ride to the hospital), or pirated electricity, for example. Inside the building, there is a mosque, church, government sponsored classes for children, and small-scale markets amongst other informal amenities that have developed. (Source)

In many ways, it seems like life as usual.  I found a quote from a 20-year-old dweller named Paito who has lived at the Grande Hotel his entire life. He has an expected attachment to his home and says, “The situation is extremely bad, but a person gets used to it. Only when someone from the outside comes here, are we reminded of the inhumane conditions we live in.” (Source)

Returning to the documentary film, John Usseng draws attention to the dilemma facing the inhabitants of the Grande Hotel, the government and the international community. Housing is unattainable for most citizens of Beira and the government cannot afford to repair the Grande Hotel or provide alternative housing for its tenants. Usseng says, “If the government or international community can’t resolve this, people will have to leave gradually. People who don’t manage to get out of here will surely end up dying here.” Similarly, Lotte Stoop’s documentary, also called Grande Hotel, conveys a sense of being trapped: Wanting to leave, but having very little resources to do so; being forced to stay knowing the situation, the building itself, will likely decline further. In light of this dilemma – what seems to be an impossible situation -- the inhabitants cope and continue to construct their lives within the crumbling walls of the Grande Hotel.

References & thought-provoking links…
On the Grande Hotel:
On squatting:


Jolene Pozniak

Thursday, November 21, 2013

Wednesday, November 20, 2013

The Grande Hotel of Beira, Mozambique


The Grande Hotel of Beira, Mozambique

The Grande Hotel Of Beira in Mozambique was constructed in 1955 from the ruling Portuguese Estado Nuovo regime, as a need for the Portuguese VIP that wanted to visit Beira, this African Costal Port. It had 130 rooms, an Olympic swimming pool, restaurants and dance halls in an area of 21 000 square meters, making this the biggest hotel in Southern Africa at that time. The design used was the Art Deco which reminded guests the Portuguese 30’-40’s building style. However, the Hotel didn’t profit anything in eight years of operation, because locals could not afford to go there and the VIP of Portugal were guest of the state and were not charged for their accommodation in the Grande Hotel of Beira. As we mentioned above, this hotel closed its doors in 1963 but only some parts were still running, like the Olympic Pool where the Mozambican Swimming team was trained or for organizing official state weddings.  Finally, in 1975 Mozambique won its independence from Portugal, and the Grande hotel purpose changed drastically where the Frelimo Government used the basement as a prison for the enemies of the state. After 2 years the civil war created a lot of chaos and in 1981 Beira was declared a neutral zone, so the outcome was a flux of refugees to the Grande Hotel of Beira. Even though the civil war ended in 1992, the population at the hotel continues to grow. So far, no one seems to be responsible for that building which is left to the hands of refugees and in the hands of homeless people. Their financial and social status doesn’t allow us to take care of the building, which in this case is getting worse day by day. Its rooms do not have windows or doors, iron and other valuable materials were robbed in order to profit some money out of them. The water of the swimming pool is used to wash clothes and for bathing, which creates high level of water pollution. Today the building is in danger of destruction, which might cause the death of children living there or the spread of any infectious disease, due to the lack of hygiene and proper living conditions. The future is still too vague, because many questions cannot get answers. Which country should take care of this building if the land is Portuguese? Where are the habitants of Grande hotel going to live if the building will be reconstructed or taken by the state?
 Most of the information was found in “The Grande Hotel of Beira, Mozambique”, May 21st, 2013. Found in http://sometimes-interesting.com/2013/05/21/the-grande-hotel-of-beira-mozambique/







Appropriation of the room
As we mention previously, people invading the Hotel made use of the hotel space as they wanted to. As such we can observe people living in the primitive living conditions in what was before the most luxury hotels in the state. From what we saw in the documentary people were living in the worst condition where there were lacking electricity, running water, doors and windows. As quoted from the article in CNN written by Amy Fallon and Mark Tutton: “the telephone booths have been cut off and made into a room, the corridor is the room”. (Fallon, A. and Tutton, M. 2011) Despite their difficult living conditions, habitants of the Hotel seemed quite happy living there, not only because of a shelter but as well as they developed a community, where social interactions and collaborations were not missing. As was said by a tourist in the article mentioned above, “It was like a village within a village. It looked like the perfect social housing project”. Even though, the relationships do not miss in this social community, there are still parts that show the disrespect of the law. If we trace the history of how this people invaded the hotel by not respecting law, explains why now the habitants created and obeyed to their own ‘laws’ and rules. Due to this behavior many risky situation might happen, like robbing, prostitution, drug dealing and unfortunately even killing. As we saw the testimony of a habitant of the Grande Hotel, she experienced the death of her father due to a fight between him and another habitant. The reason was money debts.
Another aspect that we want to touch is the lack of windows and doors in the rooms. If we see the building, the lack of doors and windows reflects a safe state where everything is known to anybody, creating in this way a safe psychological state for the community, resembling to a tribe.






It is hard to imagine life in this hotel today, because building is unsafe and an eyesore. It will be better if this building will be demolished, but there a re several reasons why it can’t be done anytime soon. First, is the city of Beira does not own the land and cannot force the action. Second, the cost to raze the property is beyond anyone’s budget. Demolition of the hotel would require relocation of thousands of refugees to alternate housing. But as this building is still standing, we don’t want to imagine living in there, as the safety of the residents remains in risk. Parts of the building have started to crumble from decades of salvaging activity and as we know from Internet recourses it is only the matter of time until a floor will collapse. One of the other reasons, why we are not really interested in living there is the consideration that Beira is not a wealthy city; it’s unlikely the government can afford any kind of changes to make city more habitable and hospitable.  

Olta Tuholi, Arda Skllavi and Ulvia Alijeva